tulipas@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoThe highest funded plagiarist is probably this AI ethicistandreasplagiarism.wordpress.comexternal-linkmessage-square17linkfedilinkarrow-up1156arrow-down114
arrow-up1142arrow-down1external-linkThe highest funded plagiarist is probably this AI ethicistandreasplagiarism.wordpress.comtulipas@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square17linkfedilink
minus-squarejust_another_person@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoNo, it’s also possible to be sued for plagiarism, so defacto punitive. I would also err on the side of ethics versus morality for something that doesn’t directly and intentionally do harm on its outset.
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year ago>would also err on the side of ethics versus morality this makes no sense.
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agothat doesnt mean its immoral. and as far as i can tell, its not even true. you can be sued for copyright infringement but plagiarism is not codified.
minus-squarejust_another_person@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoDo you know the difference?
No, it’s also possible to be sued for plagiarism, so defacto punitive.
I would also err on the side of ethics versus morality for something that doesn’t directly and intentionally do harm on its outset.
>would also err on the side of ethics versus morality
this makes no sense.
that doesnt mean its immoral.
and as far as i can tell, its not even true. you can be sued for copyright infringement but plagiarism is not codified.
Do you know the difference?
yes