Removed by mod

It’s like they shockingly didn’t think people would ever realize they didn’t need it.

No clue why. AMD is killing it right now, and they’re just slaughtering Intel’s positions in the market for the next number of years.

AMD stock should have gone through the roof on this news.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Never mentioned any sort of retroactive measures.

Downvote all you want. If your entire business or personal model includes stealing content from other people, then you need to rethink that.

Pretty good rundown

Is it Copyright content?

Don’t see an issue with this. People who scrape copyrighted content should pay for it.

Sorry to say after you wrote all that, but you’re describing malfeasance from a FUND HOLDER. Last I checked, the companies you describe are fund targets, not holders. You should get in touch with the people investing your money then, because none of these X shareholders are administrators of funds.

Yes, they have more money than small nations. They are using their CAPITAL to invest. It’s literally a legal requirement to do so in all developed markets, and these are global companies doing so. They are spending your retirement doing it. They’re spending thebinsane amount of money you give them as a fee to do it. They’d be in court today if they were doing what you’re suggesting. In the US, anything designated as a retirement fund is only held my institutions (banks) that designate themselves as such, and SEC regulations prevent them from using any NON-CAPITAL cash from investing in this way.

He’s being misquoted by the headline. He FEARS that it will make the same mistakes. Let’s be clear about RISC is here in the first place: an open-source hardware architecture. Anyone with enough money and willpower to fork it for their needs will do so. It’s anyone’s game still. He’s just simply saying that the same type of people who took over ARM and x86 are doomed to make the same mistakes. Not that RISC-V is bad.

No.

Took me all of 2 seconds: here

Institutional only now, and they’re all big companies who Musk strung along for the ride. He’s already on the hook with them, and they are obviously not pleased. He still the majority shareholder, and it’s lost 75% of its value since he took it over, and it’s clearly going to just bleed to death. They’ve already lost their investments.

He privatized and fired the board, remember? Nobody else inside to hold him accountable for being a non-stop fuckup.

Oh, nonono. You simply misunderstood him, because he’s such a genius. Didn’t you hear that he thinks he is literally the smartest engineer alive on this planet? Surely he’s not following suit of other nutjobs and simply trying to weaponize the judicial system in his favor because he essentially has unlimited money? This guy?? Nooooo…

I did this a few years ago for fun. It was a horrible idea, save for one singular use-case: tiny, few layers, single arch, and open-source.

The TLDR from my own experience: auth won’t work, complex images won’t work reliably, push won’t work, multiarch breaks, inspect breaks, meaning things like Helm won’t work, and most clients won’t work. Its basically just for show, and shouldn’t be done.

I’m sure I’m missing a few things, but for practical purposes, it’s not useful unless you’re using it for something hyper specific, at which point you may as well use the ‘export’ function to ship containers everywhere, which of course removes all the convenience of the container workflow.

Sure, it works, and maybe download speeds for the file are faster, but that’s it. Everything else is broken, and then you can’t simply do a “docker pull” to update again in the future.