Figure AI, a robotics innovator, and BMW, the German automobile giant, have revealed remarkable advancements in the Figure 02 humanoid robot’s capabilities.

Operating on a production line, the Figure 02 robot has made a significant leap, achieving a 400% increase in speed and a sevenfold improvement in success rate.

  • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    I don’t understand the desire to make humanoid robots. If a human shape is more efficient because of the workflow or physical restrictions, why not just rearrange the production line and use regular robot arms?

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      It’s so that our replacements can work alongside us just long enough for us to trust them. It’ll make us less resistant when they drag us to the bio-repurposing vats.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      The main use of humanoid robots is to work in environments suitable for humans (think inspecting a dam or such, climbing ladders and everything), as well as flexibility, especially when it comes to low-frequency tasks. BMW makes a lot of different models with tons of different options, their production line isn’t really a line it’s a directed graph.

    • Wanderer@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      Humans made things for humans.

      Rearranging everything is better but more expensive. Sometimes it absolutely will be and has been done. There will be cases where humanoid robot is cheaper and easier. That’s not even bringing up new uses like waiter or carer, but those will be much later generations.

    • HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      Along what everyone else said, so it’s more broadly marketable. In theory a humanoid robot could do any job a real human is doing now, meaning you don’t need a high tech production line to go along with it. You don’t need to automate your entire production line to get started.

      Also, it’s more of a commodity. A business could sell the robot once they don’t need it and anyone else could just buy it to use for a different purpose. Not many will have a use for highly customised robots ment for a specific task.

  • simonced@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    29 days ago

    What is the point of building faster, if you don’t sell enough to begin with…
    Smells like wasted investment/money/resources to me…

  • NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    So much prompting in movement. Until these humanoid robots can flow as easily as a human can, I’m not impressed. Even if the prompts per action rate is a couple nanoseconds, I’m not thrilled. Make them seamless.