Maybe they didn’t want to tarnish the copilot brand with risky privacy invasion

Why would that be possible? Wouldn’t the developer have their server rejected any calls from “unsigned” apps?

Did those using tutor AI spend less time on learning? That would have been worth measuring

This is probably makes a good case for open sourcing all governing algorithms

Very true because the relationship they have with laptop manufacturers will ensure windows domination

You’re right, there’s no point in general public following these news. When a lab publishes such, it’s meant for other researchers. The other researchers can try to build upon. It might become useful or as an inventor put it - discover a thousand ways of how not to do it.

When you see big numbers reported but see the deployed improvements in single digits, that’s coz the big number improvement gets deployed many years later.

They used pressurised water reactors with enriched uranium. Dunno how the costs run but there is no strategic alternative anyway. They also wouldn’t want such highly enriched uranium to be commonplace.

You can measure how well your ads are working on a category level and work on improving revenue from each industry vertical.

They could always lock in memory limits until you pay. But i don’t think they will anyway coz doing so won’t increase their sales.

Oh… didn’t know that traditional meant what you wore yesterday

Pre-independence, most Indian males had some sort of headgear. E.g. look at any old photos of Bombay

Sounds like these CEOs suck at CEOing

I meant LCDs can have it too

LCDs have that

Ummm, yeah, that’s the real difference between level 2 and 3 - who is liable

Your guess is bad and you should feel bad.

That’s b2b business which apple and google don’t do. Or aren’t good at, at the very least.