So the litmus test for a bot is to ask if it’s skibidy?
So the litmus test for a bot is to ask if it’s skibidy?
if Google wants paid, they can make a compelling and competitive product
Yep, that’s him
Storage more likely. Google owns fiber backbones and peers against the tier 1 providers directly. The over all point of ‘no, it’s still prohibitively expensive’ stands unless you’ve got 20B of dark fiber in your pocket.
I cannot imagine how those two things could possibly be true unless you did actually hear of him and either got the name wrong or just forgot
Meaning it legally must be a sealed unit with only 2 states, high and low. In Europe and/or other places there may be multiple angle states and/or strip headlights or other stuff based on their specific regulations. The result is that the efficacy of US headlight systems have a hard upper bound for how effective they can be, based on what was practical to do in the 60s.
It’s not useless, it’s saying you can’t afford the better quality product you dirty, dirty poor.
Agreed, but I don’t think anyone here is arguing against split bill for generation vs grid maintenance and improvement, just that they want return on the power they put back into the grid, if for no other reason than to offset their own investment
Sure, but it’s ‘free’ generation capacity, and storage works far better at grid scale
As a networking nerd, I am endlessly frustrated with how many otherwise smart people are just ‘fuck ipv6 lmao’
Giving me goddamn flashbacks to this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v26BAlfWBm8
Is internet archive that big? i would imagine you could run it successfully with a dozen or so people tbh