Porque no los dos? Allowing major corps to put even more downward pressure on workers doesn’t help anyone but the rich. LLMs aren’t going to save the world or become sentient.
Porque no los dos? Allowing major corps to put even more downward pressure on workers doesn’t help anyone but the rich. LLMs aren’t going to save the world or become sentient.
What is making my excited is the potential to use this for indoor position tracking for placing persistent virtual displays.
Thank you!!!
This isn’t technically correct. CRT, LCD, and OLED displays are generally constantly refreshing the image. There are some niche exceptions like memory-in-pixel displays but they are few and far between. eInk displays are very different in this aspect because the display itself acts as a physical memory of the image because its mechanism of creating an image involves physical changes (pigmented particles moving closer or further away from the visible plane).
I suspect that it works better when it is applied after saying “It’s morphin’ time!”.
To be honest, this could be an example of where AI could do marginally better. I don’t mean that because of code quality or functionality. I mean it in the sense of MS software getting absolutely fucked by internal competition and stack-ranking fostered during the Balmer years. The APIs are inconsistent and there is a ton of partially implemented stuff that will never be pushed to completion because everyone who worked on it was fired.
An AI might be able to implement things without intentionally sabotaging itself but, because LLMs are in the forefront of what would be used and do not have the capability of intention or understanding context, I’m a bit pessimistic.
But plenty of electricity still needed.
I’m inclined to believe that they’re throwing all prompts and outputs into a db and searching that.
This is why SAG-AFTRA is right to strike. Just another way to rob people of their labor. The “savings” come at a direct cost to performers’ ability to support themselves in an already highly-competitive field. And there is no way that the “savings” will be passed on to customers.
Would be nice if more startups would try to use the LLMs for good, instead of trying to paint circumventing one of the few US unions with any power as anything but scabbing.
HAProxy also has stick tables, pretty beefy ACLs, Lua support, and support for calling external programs. With the first two one can do pretty decent, IP, behavior, and header based throttling, blocking or tarpitting. Add in Lua and external program support and you can do some pretty advanced and high-performance bot detection in your language of choice. All in the FOSS version, which also includes active backend health checks.
It’s really a pretty awesome LB/Proxy.
The problem is the unethical use of software that does not do what it claims and instead uses end users for free labor. The solution is not to use it. For rate limiting a proxy/load-balancer like HAProxy will accomplish the task easily. Ex:
This is correct. If using an OS, an RTOS like the Linux Foundation Zephyr OS is the right choice here.
There are much better ways of rate limiting that don’t steal labor from people.
That’s absolutely crazy. Taking the Chicago School MBA philosophy to things as time consuming and expensive to setup as silicon production.
Needs to be a percentage of revenue earned to eliminate the possibility of passing the buck. So… It’s not happening any time soon.
And if you have a 3D printer, you can make your own pieces and share them with others.
I really wish that an affordable desktop chip fab was a thing. Maybe with graphene semiconductors it could be feasible.
Curious from your perspective what you’d like to see. From mine, Viture and Xreal are nearly perfect, with the exception of Xreal failing to be supportive of open APIs.
That’s what they were SO close to getting. Solutions like Xreal Air and Viture are just much more comfortable and less isolating.
Shhh! You’ll scare him off!