Yes, not using ai is the guardrail
Yes, not using ai is the guardrail
Really shows the difference between Knowing how to work with, and how it works
I wonder how long until all the distros have this.
Wrll you have to use a pixel phone to use graphene os
You eXcrete on X
Well some llm have been caught wirh cp in their training data
Well there is truth in that. Look at politics. Lots of people what a better workd and know what the end result us , but they don’t know how to get that. Or for a simple example. People will reply to survives saying they want dark roasted coffee, but they mostly buy medium roast i the usa.
im curious where you are if you still pay each text
Thats one thing America has going for it. Texting is still a thing here
Oh no i am aware of that distinction. I just think it needs to go away and be replaced.
Currently sec 230 treats websites as not responsible for user generated content. Example, if I made a video defaming someone I get sued but YouTube is in the clear. But if The New York Times publishes an article defaming someone they get sued not just the writer.
Why? Because NYT published that article but YouTube just hosts it. This publisher platform distinction is not stated in section 230 but it is part of usa law.
Yeah i have made that argument before. By pushing content via user recommended lists and auto play YouTube becomes a publisher and meeds to be held accountable
Oh good i dont use that
are they talking about smart phone app to unlock cars or the keyless entry that has been around since the 90s?
sms is fine.
That is one good thing about america, whatsapp never caught
If put 30 in a bowl if milk you have to go to the hospital
It will if employeers only want ai code
Possibly but they would have to take chromium and fork it
You dont have to be an expert, i barely know anything about the kinux cli but i still use linux daily