Not for potato supreme. I’m sure labels and sony bought vacations for those sub human coup supporting shits

Multi threading is parallelism and is poised to scale to a similar factor, the primary issue is simply getting tensors in and out of the ALU. Good enough is the engineering game. Having massive chunks of silicon laying around without use are a mach more serious problem. At the present, the choke point is not the parallelism of the math but actually the L2 to L1 bus width and cycle timing. The ALU can handle the issue. The AVX instruction set is capable of loading 512 bit wide words in a single instruction, the problem is just getting these in and out in larger volume.

I speculate that the only reason this has not been done already is because pretty much because of the marketability of single thread speeds. Present thread speeds are insane and well into the radio realm of black magic bearded nude virgins wizardry. I don’t think it is possible to make these bus widths wider and maintain the thread speeds because it has too many LCR consequences. I mean, at around 5 GHz the concept of wire connections and gaps as insulators is a fallacy when capacitive coupling can make connections across all small gaps.

Personally, I think this is a problem that will take on a whole new architectural solution. It is anyone’s game unlike any other time since the late 1970’s. It will likely be the beginning of the real RISC-V age and the death of x86. We are presently at the age of the 20+ thread CPU. If a redesign can make a 50-500 logical core CPU slower for single thread speeds but capable of all workloads, I think it will dominate easily. Choosing the appropriate CPU model will become much more relevant.

Mainstream is about to collapse. The exploitation nonsense is faltering. Open source is emerging as the only legitimate player.

Nvidia is just playing conservative because it was massively overvalued by the market. The GPU use for AI is a stopover hack until hardware can be developed from scratch. The real life cycle of hardware is 10 years from initial idea to first consumer availability. The issue with the CPU in AI is quite simple. It will be solved in a future iteration, and this means the GPU will get relegated back to graphics or it might even become redundant entirely. Once upon a time the CPU needed a math coprocessor to handle floating point precision. That experiment failed. It proved that a general monolithic solution is far more successful. No data center operator wants two types of processors for dedicated workloads when one type can accomplish nearly the same task. The CPU must be restructured for a wider bandwidth memory cache. This will likely require slower thread speeds overall, but it is the most likely solution in the long term. Solving this issue is likely to accompany more threading parallelism and therefore has the potential to render the GPU redundant in favor of a broader range of CPU scaling.

Human persistence of vision is not capable of matching higher speeds that are ultimately only marketing. The hardware will likely never support this stuff because no billionaire is putting up the funding to back up the marketing with tangible hardware investments. … IMO.

Neo Feudalism is well worth abandoning. Most of us are entirely uninterested in this business model. I have zero faith in the present market. I have AAA capable hardware for AI. I play and mod open source games. I could easily be a customer in this space, but there are no game manufacturers. I do not make compromises in ownership. If I buy a product, my terms of purchase are full ownership with no strings attached whatsoever. I don’t care about what everyone else does. I am not for sale and I will not sell myself for anyone’s legalise nonsense or pay ownership costs to rent from some neo feudal overlord.

Sharks regrow their teeth, not their fins.

Why don’t they start by cutting the head off of the monster that got them in this position. That should be the first step. Stupid sharks loose their teeth, not their fins that actually do the work. Like, everyone in corporate should be sued and owe back every bit of their pay from the last few years. This is a steering problem. So replace the wheel and fuck up the old one.

phayl

Pareto principal for psyops, by a think tank organization too. Why is this nonsense tractable here?

A whitelist filtered firewall never gets CAPTCHAs. The only ones I ever see are if they are self hosted on the server of an approved address, and that is like one every few years. The majority of those that you see are not related to the websites you visit. In most instances it is related to 3rd party junk, probably ads’ PII.

Pitcher and catcher

Funny. No. This is not remotely comparable to CPU’s crashing because of a lack of R&D and half ass quarter earnings profiteering culture’s lack of intelligent long term thinking. It is not remote accessible. This is just corporate psyops in an attempt to coverup their overwhelming neo feudal incompetence. If they had the staff and invested reasonably, the problems wouldn’t happen. Paint the world in shit to continue the claim that yours does not stink. Only idiots buy into that.

deleted by creator

There is no way for advertisers to know that their ads are actually shown. That is why an ad is a link to the advertiser’s website. If there is one thing I have learned from uploading to YT and watching, it’s that YT is terrible at transparency and this kind of logistics. I doubt this will work at all.

K-rapy garboge!:

There’s little that users of an affected device can do other than install a patch if one becomes available from the manufacturer.

Gentoo gives extensive instructions:

• https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Secure_Boot

Arch:

• https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface/Secure_Boot

NIST (US government guides cover POSIX/Windows with a layperson explanation and guide):

• https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/key-management
• https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/specialpublications/nist.sp.800-57pt3r1.pdf

The technical documentation about Secure Boot says that SB is not a mechanisms to steal ownership of your device. It is a spurious claim because the design specification is only a reference and not a requirement. Gentoo has further documentation that can be found describing KeyTool, a package that enables booting directly into UEFI to change the keys manually if your implemented UEFI bootloader lacks the functional implementation required to sign your own keys. I’ve never tried it personally. I merely know of its existence.

I’m not sure what entities, motivations, qualifications, connections underpin Lex Fridman with his podcasts/YT channel, but he has interviewed many people in AI including Zuckerberg, Altmann, and Musk. His interviews with Yann LeCunn are quite interesting. Professor LeCunn is the head of Meta AI. His longer interviews are much better in total for showing the lay of the land overview perspective. Some little clip does not do justice to the overall points taken in context, but telling you to go watch an hour long interview to get the answer directly does not work either.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fshIOoTo40E

This is a 4min clip of LeCunn saying, basically it doesn’t hurt anyone. He’s essentially implying it will hurt OpenAI or any proprietary.

I was trying to find the interview where Lex and Yann talk about the leaked Google memo last year, because that one is really good, but YT seems to be obfuscating that one intentionally in search results.

IIRC, in that one, LeCunn was saying something to the effect of the only way people can really trust AI is with transparency and that requires open source as a foundation. Using something like OpenAI in business is insane. You’re basically selling every aspect of your company to Altmann for peanuts. Likewise with personal use, this is like your life long psychiatrist opening a few side businesses as a political analyst, insurance broker, banker, and healthcare insurance provider, while working nights as a Judge. While you’re asked to sign away any privacy or confidentiality. Models turn human language and culture into a statistical math problem that has far better than 50% probabilities in nearly any aspect of human existence. If you ask a model to give a profile for Name-1, it will tell you all kinds of seemingly unrelated things about the person. The more you interact, the more accurate this profile becomes, even in areas that make no sense, have no logical association, and were never a part of the conversation. It is the key to manipulating people unlike any other tool in history. That is why open source offline AI is the only sensible way to use AI.

Willing to bet Zuck enjoys Jarvis. Bet there is also a ridiculous back and forth over this with Musk and Altmann.

Any of the 3 could solve American homelessness over night, but build Hawaiian preper bunker islands instead.

At least Zuck is only trying to lead and not monopolize.

Isn’t there an AMD 16 GB card too, like a 7600 or something?

Yeah. It is different for laptops. The 3080 market nomenclature is all over the place. Look up the model number to confirm the manufacturer’s specs. Linux hardware probe should list them too. It has been a year since I did all of my research but IIRC the mobile version only came with “3080” 8 GB and “3080Ti” 16 GB. I have the 16 GB and can confirm it is a thing. That is the largest GPU in a laptop for the last generation RTX 3xxx stuff. The largest AMD sold at the same time is a 12 GB 6850 IIRC but the AMD 6k series doesn’t (did not at the time) have the same HIPS ROCM support as the AMD 7k series new stuff (not sure if it has changed).

The following is an old pic from a year ago. The left side is tiled into 3 terminals, top is the running model inference, middle is htop, bottom is my GPU monitoring script that also shows the total memory available. This was also a 70b Llama 2 model (GGML and 4bit quantization)

Any government authoritarian intervention in AI is a joke. The US has a greatly diluted sense of relevance. AI research is international and restrictions will only make the USA irrelevant. Even the names you think of as American are actually funding advancements coming from other countries, most of them in Germany and Asia. I’ve read several white papers on current AI research recently, none were from US based schools or academics. The USA is simply not relevant in some imperial nonsense narrative. AI is a vital military technology. Limiting it through Luddite isolationism will reduce the experience pool massively, and push the research further into places where fresh economic growth is happening without regressive stagnation and corruption of toxic consolidation of wealth.

If they didn’t follow a procedure, it is still a culture/management issue that should follow the distribution of wealth 1:1 in the company.