And once again, I am seriously questioning Apple’s privacy claims. Why else would Apple build such a moat around Safari?
And once again, I am seriously questioning Apple’s privacy claims. Why else would Apple build such a moat around Safari?
I used to agree with this, but hearing interviews with actual victims changed my mind. This only works in theory.
There are fewer barriers with helmets because they are usually tinted.
I’m a fan of anything that keeps eyes more forwards/on the road.
My phone autocorrects this wrong frequently, like it’s life depends on it. One can assume GP typed the correct thing.
Hololens is slightly more advanced. At least the last I saw it uses waveguides etc. to overlay the content over a transparent panel. Much like Google glasses, but way, way more advanced (and therefore justifiably expensive - last I saw, again, it was something like $15000). AVP is no different to a $300 Quest (plus internal cameras for iris and expression tracking and obnoxiously bad FOV) - it’s 10x Apple tax.
Hololens is still alive and kicking btw, but it’s exclusively enterprise.
Here’s the state of the art VR: https://www.bigscreenvr.com/. You’d need that plus Valve base stations and controllers, so about $1500 total. It’s miles ahead of anything anyone else is offering, especially Apple. You can’t demo it to others though, it really does only work for the person that it’s made for.
As opposed to the human-made brain melting videos?