But then they can’t force you to watch claim that you watched the ad at the start of the video for that sweet advertiser revenue.

But the OS crashing as a result of that systemic failure may actually be the most reasonable desirable outcome compared to any other possible outcome.

In which case this should’ve been documented behaviour and probably configurable.

Hmmmm.

More like standing there and loudly shitting your pants and spreading it around the stage.

Except “freak out” could have various manifestations.

In this case it was “burn down the venue”.

It should have been “I’m sorry, there’s been an issue, let’s move on to the next speaker”

Poorly written code can’t.

In this case:

1. Load config data
2. If data is valid:
   1. Use config data
3. If data is invalid:
   1. Crash entire OS

Is just poor code.

If anything, it’s probably calmed P’n’S down a bit…

NVIDIA spent many many years doing a very very poor job of providing drivers for Linux.

Many people have not forgiven them for that.

Remember: in most cases the c-suite consider you merely as resources(human) a source of labour.

To them employees are things.

Customers are just a revenue source, they are also just things.

CEO’s are just chasing their next quarterly performance bonus.

Take an article from a reputable publisher, an article for a subject that you are expert in.

Read it and make note of facts they got right and got wrong.

Now apply that same ratio to articles where you have little or no expertise.

These guys are just speed running th at to its inevitable end.

… but only one word at a time. So you end up with:

• Bread
• Cheese
• Cow eggs
• Chicken milk

… Or calling your aunt and having her yell things at you that she thinks might be on your Mum’s shopping list.

It was the right time to ensure the right stock price at the right time.

An enormous company like Boeing always has myriad legal things going on. There’s always a little litigious jitter in their stock price.

Everything Swampy knew, the big cheeses did too and more. Statements entering the courts’ records makes them more difficult to casually dismiss. Evidence of top echelon mismanagement becomes a problem, a stock price problem.

Other breaches do.

If two breaches have an overlap, e.g. they both contain email address, then they can be joined into a more complete set.

Other breaches do.

If two breaches have an overlap, e.g. they both contain email address, then they can be joined into a more complete set.

The problem is that this data can be combined with other data. An email address by itself isn’t particularly important but when it’s matched up with names, physical addresses, DoB, SSN, other PII and the network of other services with matching data it becomes very serious.

It’s never just this breach, it’s every other breach as well. Every breach makes every preceeding breach more effective and more valuable.

Oh yeah, the results are worse, but at least I can filter with search grammar and not also have to mentally filter out the ads too.

I’m not sure if we’ve ended up back at the ol’ altavista/askjeeves keyword-stuffed hell yet, but it’s close.

I switched to DDG merely to get rid of Google’s irrelevant paid results up top.

If I’m searching for brand model manual I don’t need every competitor’s marketing detritus.

Likewise contact details etc… it’s maddening.