Confused gay fascist who is more than likely a white nationalist, Peter Thiel.
Confused gay fascist who is more than likely a white nationalist, Peter Thiel.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Manufacturing costs will probably determine whether it carries missiles, or is a missile.
Well, that’s all very idealistic, but it’s likely not going to happen.
Israel already used AI to pick bombing sites, those bombs and missiles would have been programmed with altitudes and destinations (armed) then dropped. The pilots only job these days is to avoid interception, fly over the bombing locations, tag the target when acquired, and drop them. Most of this is already done in software.
Eventually humans will leave the loop because unlike self-driving cars, these technologies won’t risk the lives of the aggressor’s citizens.
If the technology is seen as unstoppable enough, there may be calls for warnings to be given, but I suspect that’s all the mercy that will be shown…
… especially if it’s a case of a country with automated technologies killing one without or with stochastically meaningless defenses (eg. Defenses that modelling and simulations show won’t be able to prevent such attacks).
No, in all likelihood the US will tell the country the attack sites, the country either will or will not have the technical level to prevent an amount of damage, will evacuate all necessary personal, and whoever doesn’t get the message or get out in time will be automatically killed.
Where defenses are partially successful, that information will go into the training data for the next model, or upgrade, and the war machine will roll on.
…they enjoy the profits from making Apple products and they do have a legal system over there, so your suggestions is dubious at best.
I don’t think they’d actually respond. Also TikTok is only partially Chinese owned.
That said the US would probably have to make a strong case TikTok is being used to convey Chinese propaganda in a way that’s irrevocable or uncontrollable.
Only the losing side is subject to war crimes trials, and no doubt rules of engagement will be developed and followed to prevent people going to jail due to “bad kills”.
There are really no “bad kills” in the armed services, there’s just limited exposure of public scandals.
Especially for the US who doesn’t subject its self to international courts like The Hague. So any atrocities, accidents, or war crimes will still just be internal scandals and temporary.
Same as it is today.
What if the human is pulling the trigger to “paint the target” and tag it for hunt and destroy then the drone goes and kills it? Because that’s how lots of missles already work. So where’s the line?
Removed by mod
They were building like five a year or something ridiculous because it’s Musk’s pet project, and so nothing was designed in a mass production friendly way.
They fail the safety standards in most countries that aren’t the USA.
Light can’t melt steel beams, otherwise all the buildings would collapse. /s
Everybody can use whichever pictures they like as far as I am concerned.
Not really, it’s a shared data set to make sure colours appear at uniform levels across different media and types of software in order to maintain stable image formats that can be sent over internet protocols…
…the whole point is to have a catalogue of standard test images to compare transfer and compression results to globally.
As a rule, files never get deleted… They get over written. So it depends on whether that process has happened to any loose images.