Good point, they probably focused this press release on the content of this initial dataset.
This isn’t “I want to believe”, this is “it would be irresponsible to not consider”.
Good point, they probably focused this press release on the content of this initial dataset.
Read parent comment.
Upvote parent comment.
Read child comment.
Post reply to child as if you upvoted parent before reading it.
Good catch! Thanks for checking the source.
deleted by creator
Yeah, I gave up reading at
it’s a shocking reminder that there are forces outside of the internet that still affect our digital lives.
s/Fire/Nationalize/
I love organic maps and openstreetmaps. The biggest thing missing is satellite view. I like to wander around and explore an area on maps before visiting. OSM has more interesting/relevant details and better visual color coding than the vector street map on google. Google has a satellite map, which is non-negotiable for me especially if I need to quickly orient myself while driving in a new place. I use three layers loaded into qgis for planning trips: OSM, google maps satellite, and a topographic map from USGS. I sometimes use organic maps on my phone if I don’t have access to a computer with qgis. I rely on Google while on location because organic maps lacks a satellite feed.
These ecosystems are well studied.
This isn’t controversial in the slightest. We are destroying unique ecosystems with every barrel we extract.
Ok, but what about the ecosystems dependent on that chemical energy staying underground?
It’s a thermostat.
I’m coming from a field where supporting software written in the 70s is the norm.
Your argument is horribly short-sighted and wasteful.
Only 16 years old is extremely recent software that ought to be easily maintained in any sane world.
Fantastic resource, thanks for sharing