Yeah, something doesn’t add up. Even if all 17000 employees were paid $400k/year (I’d be shocked if this were the case) that would be ~1/3 this amount. I smell BS.

So much this to the point that the title pisses me off for supporting the idea that share price is the appropriate metric for a 'turnaround '.

For me its more the risk that making real and fake speech indistinguishable renders any speech meaningless.