Considering in much of the world Google defaults to AI answers now, it’s just a matter of who makes up less incorrect shit

That’s cool. Here those not wanting extra equipment have a phone number you use to send the money to

I wouldn’t listen to the station if it was your normal commercial channel presenters. I can’t stand that shit.

Right. Wikipedia defines it as such

A self-driving car, also known as a autonomous car (AC), driverless car, robotaxi, robotic car or robo-car,[1][2][3] is a car that is capable of operating with reduced or no human input.

But also

Organizations such as SAE have proposed terminology standards. However, most terms have no standard definition and are employed variously by vendors and others. Proposals to adopt aviation automation terminology for cars have not prevailed.

So there’s no one definition. It is driving by itself. You don’t have to do any driving. But you should keep alert so if something happens you can taker over. Seems like it fits with the general use imo but doesn’t fulfill the more stringent definitions.

It’s self-driving but you need to supervise it because you are both responsible and because it’s not perfect.

I’ve listened to stations where it’s all AI. Presenters are AI, song selection is AI, news and whatnot are read by AI. I actually found it less annoying than your typical commercial radio station.

If it’s mostly music and there’s a news segment with an AI reading the news, that sorta thing, I don’t really see a reason to be upset

Do you mean the original topic or what?

It’s true, I have no idea what you are on about and what your messages have to do with the topic

I’m waiting for the part that it gets used for things that are not lazy

Replacing menial or boring tasks is like 90% of what I’m hoping from it.

The image generation features are fun, even though you have to browbeat the idiot AI into following the description.

Not sure if copypasta or AI text…

You seemed to have trouble understanding what was going on.

The article was specifically about India. So people specifically criticized India. Doesn’t seem vague to me.

I’m saying you are taking a specific criticism and veering it into a vague criticism. The article is about India so criticism is directed towards India. Saying “it’s bad whoever does it” bring nothing to the table.

This article is specifically about India, going All Lives Matter just seems strange here.

Article is specifically about India

I mean, North Koreans did kidnap people from abroad, so technically…

Trains from every factory to the end consumers might be a bit project

Hard disagree, e-ink is fantastic for two thing, reading and battery life. Everything interactive, you’re better off with a tablet.

Comics are a form of reading

We both mentioned it separarely. And for a good reason imo, traditional books are a much better fit for e-readers because reflowing text just werks while comics are going to be a lot harder.

Highlighting, taking notes, comics all seem different from just reading