I think you replied to the wrong person. I was writing about stealing data.
I think you replied to the wrong person. I was writing about stealing data.
You don’t even need the word Chinese
Good point. Everything you feed into chatgpt is stored for future reference.
If they had something better, don’t you think they’d be putting it out front and center?
Only when the product is ready. Look at open.ai/research and you’ll see they do a lot more than just chatGPT.
I already have stable diffusion on a local machine. I was trying to find motivation to install a LLM locally. You answered my question in a different response
use cases where customization helps while quality does matter much due to scale, i.e spam, then LLMs and related tools are amazing.
pick which model best fits your needs.
What is the need I have to put the effort in to install all this locally. Websites win in terms of convenience.
We don’t know what they aren’t showing us. GPT was only one strand of research
Is it better to buy a ps4?
This. The ISP isn’t going to care about (or notice) a single person using a router. They will notice and care if 1 person is consuming the data of 20.
Fall in share price, yes.
Bankrupt, no. Their debt to Equity Ratio is 0.1455. They can pay off their $11.23 B debt with 2 months of revenue. They can certainly afford the interest payments.
Bot listening is probably fraud.
he botted his songs in order to earn royalties.
So if the listens were natural there would no case?
Yes. I’d also add that current copyright laws are archaic and counterproductive when combined with modern technology.
Creators need protection, but only for 15 years. Not death + 70 years.
nobody gets paid based on whether or not you fastforward
You know skip exists. Advertisers only pay when viewers watch at least 30 seconds of a long ad or engage with it.
Let’s go to the early days of “piracy”
You are claiming that fast forwarding the opening trailers and adverts on a rented VHS is piracy.
Scroll passed Bing’s sponsored bullshit
Ah. Still some ads then.
It’s parasitism if it’s for their own benefit only.
Now, if openAI actually opened their AI (weights and models, not just access) then maybe the argument would be stronger.
in ways that exceed the limits of free speech
I think this part is key. X is hiding behind US laws which Brazil and the EU have very little say in.
The brazil Judiciary want some profiles blocked. Is that what the EU should demand too?
Blocking profiles seems heavy handed, and best aimed at the individual, not the provider.
Think of a van as an enormous truck storage bin.