Mastodon: @greg@clar.ke
Facebook is the drug. It’s addictive, mind altering, exploits dopamine hits, isolates individuals in bad circles, makes you spend longer on the toilet etc. It’s literally the blue pill.
Have they considered implementing this technology in Mexican football stadiums?
The sea is unforgiving
That’s not true, I peed in the sea once but we’re friends again now
Is @son_named_bort@lemmy.world a son who is named bort? Or are they saying they have a son named Bort?
Xit that’s funny!
Yes but with this sub the water was on the inside too
To be fair, they’re under water and sharks have been known to chew through electrical cables
I’m never buying a Google product again after dealing with their “support” for a warranty repair. I’ve given Google thousands over the years. What a silly short sighed company they’ve become.
I’d step back at that launch
The use of CSAM in training generative AI models is an issue no matter how these models are being used.
This is tough, the goal should be to reduce child abuse. It’s unknown if AI generated CP will increase or reduce child abuse. It will likely encourage some individuals to abuse actual children while for others it may satisfy their urges so they don’t abuse children. Like everything else AI, we won’t know the real impact for many years.
Jokes on you Slack, I’m not intelligent!
Haha, that was literally the exact same point I stopped reading. I have emails older than this system and they weren’t stored on floppys 😂
I can’t verify this story with any reputable sources. Is this real or just boomerbait?
Lol exactly, how dare you have a nuanced opinion!
I thought Twitter’s infrastructure was going to collapse within weeks after Musk made all those cuts and changes. I was obviously wrong because Twitter’s infrastructure didn’t collapse. I’m not speaking to the user experience on Twitter but from a purely infrastructure perspective, Musk was right and I was wrong.
And does that make Mistral the new OpenAI?
The FAA failed to regulate Boeing. I’m pro regulation and laws that protect people’s privacy. And if this company and the individuals within it break the law they should receive appropriate punishments with fines tied to international revenue.
My point is that the laws should relate to privacy independent of the technology. The “ban face recognition” narrative misses the point and doesn’t address the threats. Facial recognition technology can be used in ways that don’t threaten individuals privacy and non facial recognition technologies can be a threat to individual privacy.
It’s cynical to assume this company is breaking privacy with no evidence. But it’s fair to say there needs to be greater punishments and regulations
Google has become an awful company. I’m in the process of degoogling but it’s not easy given all the monopolies they have created