AtHeartEngineer

I think it’s pretty reasonable for a company as big as delta to wait a little bit to see how a patch rolls out before upgrading.

We need consumer privacy laws

Agreed, do endeavour, plain arch (maybe with something like arch install), or hard pivot and try nixos. Manjaro has never really been a good option.

That X is twice as much vram, which funny enough, is great for running ai models

This is much much harder though, and would risk exposing the vulnerabilities they are using, so they likely won’t use these methods unless it’s higher profile and involves some higher up govt entities. Your normal street crime cop shop won’t be able to do this.

Good for him, I hope he is ok

ARM is not paltry, it’s in small/portable devices because it’s efficient, not weak.

Which can be missed by an examiner

So many people on Lemmy are pessimistic as shit, makes it hard to read the comments sometimes

I think they are doing this above board, so it’s just “contracts”. It’s not illegal, just shortsighted. Just like lobbying isn’t technically bribery because it’s “official bribery” so it’s got a different name.

I ran /r/cryptotechnology for years, and am good friends with the /r/cc mods. Reddit is a mess though, especially in the crypto areas.

Fair point, I agree with this. There should probably be another icon in the browser that shows if all, some, or none of the media on a page has signatures that can be validated. Though that gets messy as well, because what is “media”? Things can be displayed in a web canvas or SVG that appears to be a regular image, when in reality it’s rendered on the fly.

Security and cryptography UX is hard. Good point, thanks for bringing that up! Btw, this is kind of my field.

The best way this could be handled is a green check mark near the video that you could click on it and it would give you all the meta data of the video (location, time, source, etc) with a digital signature (what would look like a random string of text) that you could click on and your browser would show you the chain of trust, where the signature came from, that it’s valid, probably the manufacturer of the equipment it was recorded on, etc.