Please - assume - the - position.

Now that’s a harassment i’d like seeing.

You will love this. https://youtu.be/29ECwExc-_M

100% that Optimus can’t even recover themselves after falling down, or even self balance when bump into. They have to clear the line for Optimus to carefully walk toward the crowd lol.

You should add “love you” after this.

They’re still looking for a purpose for Atlas iirc. While they have Stretch as a loading/unloading robot and Spot as a patrolling/surveying robot, Atlas has been the robot they’re developing for the longest time yet with a specific purpose. I’m assuming they’ll still use Atlas as a researching platform so they can transfer what they learn to making a more refined robot with specific purpose, while at the same time refining it to be as good as a bipedal robot can be.

There’s no such thing as AI assist for decades and people still success creating masterpiece. It’s techbro and tech tycoon that hurts everyone.

I too embrace Adobe Illustrator once but i’m not successful. Cool program though.

Wait, wrong AI.

If you ask China if there’s any country call Taiwan, they will tell you you’re insane for thinking that.

It’s perspective.

Hmm, thats true about AGI.

The issue here is Tesla didn’t made the robot for that, but instead Melon Husk promised a personal robot butler that can do anything asked. If he came out on day one promised a remote controlled robot for hazardous situation or for warehouse work, like most robotic company are, he won’t get shit on this much.

Given that juxtaposition, it’s no wonder even some experts were willing to believe the partying prototypes on display were operating largely on their own.

“Fooled me,” Deepwater Asset Management Managing Partner Gene Munster admitted on social media after hearing reports of Optimus’ teleoperation. That admission came just hours after Munster posted about how the event was “just the start of mega AI use cases.”

Well technically not expert in robotic and tech, but still.

https://youtu.be/OtpCyjQDW0w

This is how they control the robot probably lol, and “expert” really believe in short 5 months Tesla able to pump out an actual AGI.

It’s funny that Boston Dynamic has been quite successful with their biped robot, then Tesla announce something without even a working prototype.

Then Waymo has been quite successful with their driverless taxi, then Melon announce something without even a working prototype.

I wonder what he will copy next.

Ohh so you can’t even give me a reason why i should trust something without safety rail, only talk about how safe it is right now, supervised, but didn’t elaborate on why steering-less, unsupervised system without redundant safety feature like having a lidar is okay. And i’m the emotional one and not participating. Sure bud.

Go drive manual and ensure the world always has a person watching, because people don’t get distracted…right?

What are you on about? 🤨 You talk about the topic as if everyone driving a Tesla or Melon Husk have the intention to share the technology with every car maker.

Recently found out about F9, superb content even though i don’t ride motorcycle.

Things may happen once in a while for a completely new technology involving vehicles and driving, but for the long term it is a necessary step to develop something that can save countless more lives.

Do you know how villainous that sounds?

“some of you may die, but it’s a sacrifice i’m willing to make.”

Yeah, you sounds like a villain from VHS copy of Shrek.

What makes you think that the system will always need to be supervised?

What makes you think a system doesn’t need to be supervised? What datacenter doesn’t have people readily available to make change and fix bug? What autonomous factory doesn’t have people readily available to stop the system and jump in to fix fatal error? What autonomous train system doesn’t have failsafe and purposefully build infrastructure to support the automation to be as safe as possible?

What makes you think Tesla done something so good, so brilliant that’s better than those enclosed, sandboxed environment, that it doesn’t need lidar as a failsafe? What gives Tesla special privilege to throw safety out of the window because of Melon Husk’s ego?

If you so desperately trying to save life, here’s some suggestion.

A disaster using camera only for autopilot?

A disaster for steering-less, unsupervised autopilot car. There’s a difference.

If you take a ride in one it’s not hard at all to see how it could operate fully autonomously even within the next year.

I’ve have faith before when CGP Grey simp so much on Tesla autopilot several years ago, but that faith waned so hard after several mishap and death. Yes, it’s gonna be fully autopilot like before, but it would need to be supervised as always.

In the case of steering-less tesla, there’s no backup driver to prevent this.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator