Title is a little sensational but this is a cool project for non-technical folks who may need a mini-internet or data archive for a wide variety of reasons:

“PrepperDisk is a mini internet box that comes preloaded with offline backups of Wikipedia, street maps, survivalist information, 90,000 WikiHow guides, iFixit repair guides, government website backups (including FEMA guides and National Institutes of Health backups), TED Talks about farming and survivalism, 60,000 ebooks and various other content. It’s part external hard drive, part local hotspot antenna—the box runs on a Raspberry Pi that allows up to 20 devices to connect to it over wifi or wired connections, and can store and run additional content that users store on it. It doesn’t store a lot of content (either 256GB or 512GB), but what makes it different from buying any external hard drive is that it comes preloaded with content for the apocalypse.”

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Of the possibilities, I find

    How do you find that? Through some kind of rigorous analysis, or just an intuitive feeling?

    As I keep saying, the human mind is not good at intuitively handling very large or very small numbers and probabilities.

    You’re analyzing a risk we could imagine, what you can’t do is analyze a risk we haven’t imagined yet.

    What you can’t do is analyze a risk without doing an actual analysis. For that you need to collect data and work the numbers, not just imagine them.

    Not miraculously, we know some of the causes that make this happen.

    Yes, and all the causes that we know don’t apply to any nearby stars that might threaten us. You have to make up imaginary new causes in order to be frightened of a gamma ray burst.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      How do you find that? Through some kind of rigorous analysis, or just an intuitive feeling?

      When data is absent, rigorous analysis is impossible. When data is severely lacking, attempts at rigorous analysis are more intuition than anything else.

      you need to collect data and work the numbers, not just imagine them.

      And when the data can’t be collected? Contingency planning and resource allocation for the unknown is folly, right up until it is the smartest thing to do.

      all the causes that we know don’t apply to any nearby stars that might threaten us.

      That we know of.

      We should focus on expanding our knowledge and plan based on the best data we have, but like the first lunar astronauts spending 21 days in quarantine, a bit of planning and care for the unknown isn’t a bad idea either.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        There are an infinite number of things for which there is no evidence. Preparing for those things would be taking effort away from preparing for things that are actually real.

        The first lunar astronauts spent 21 days in quarantine because we know that diseases are real and in the past there have been real examples of explorers bringing back new diseases from the places they visited. They didn’t simultaneously get ritually cleansed by a shaman because there is no evidence of actual lycanthropy being a thing.