Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, speaks at the meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. (Denis Balibouse/Reuters)

    • hai@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Worldcoin, founded by US tech entrepreneur Sam Altman, offers free crypto tokens to people who agree to have their eyeballs scanned.

      What a perfect sentence to sum up 2023 with.

    • It's A Faaaahhkeah!@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Mr Altman, who founded Open AI which built chat bot ChatGPT, says he hopes the initiative will help confirm if someone is a human or a robot.

      That last line kinda creeps me out.

        • It's A Faaaahhkeah!@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yeah that’s most most sci-fi dystopian article I’ve read in a while.

          The line where one of the people waiting to get their eyes scanned is well eye opening " I don’t care what they do with the data, I just want the money", this is why they want us poor, so we need money so badly that we will impatiently hand over everything that makes us.

          But we already happily hand over our DNA genome to private corporations, so what’s an eye scan gonna do…

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yup, my job sent us to an AI/ML training program from a top cloud computing provider, and there were a few hospital execs there too.

      They were absolutely giddy about being able to use it to deny unprofitable medical care. It was disgusting.

  • nymwit@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So just like shitty biased algorithms shouldn’t be making life changing decisions on folks’ employability, loan approvals, which areas get more/tougher policing, etc. I like stating obvious things, too. A robot pulling the trigger isn’t the only “life-or-death” choice that will be (is!) automated.

  • TheFriar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Ummm…no fucking shit. Who was thinking that was a good idea?

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes on everything but drone strikes.

      A computer would be better than humans in those scenarios. Especially driving cars, which humans are absolutely awful at.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        So if it looks like it’s going to crash, should it automatically turn off and go “Lol good luck” to the driver now suddenly in charge of the life-and-death situation?

            • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              The computer, of course.

              A properly designed autonomous vehicle would be polling data from hundreds of sensors hundreds/thousands of times per second. A human’s reaction speed is 0.2 seconds, which is a hell of a long time in a crash scenario.

              It has a way better chance of a ‘life’ outcome than a human who’s either unaware of the potential crash, or is in fight or flight mode and making (likely wrong) reactions based on instinct.

              Again, humans are absolutely terrible at operating giant hunks of metal that go fast. If every car on the road was autonomous, then crashes would be extremely rare.