lysdexic@programming.devM to C++@programming.devEnglish · 9 months agoC++ Should Be C++www.open-std.orgexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: cpp
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkC++ Should Be C++www.open-std.orglysdexic@programming.devM to C++@programming.devEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: cpp
minus-squareMadhuGururajan@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-29 months agoMy point is that the design is wrong. Nobody expects [] as lvalue to update a value. Your argument is descriptive, mine is prespcriptive. I am saying that the C++ committee is wrong on this one (or whoever designed it this way)
My point is that the design is wrong. Nobody expects [] as lvalue to update a value. Your argument is descriptive, mine is prespcriptive. I am saying that the C++ committee is wrong on this one (or whoever designed it this way)