? Thunderbolt is just a fancier usb-c, you can use a usb-c cable with a thunderbolt port and vice-versa. So using thunderbolt is allowed by that law.

Also apple used lightning before, not thunderbolt.

It will, no need to install anything new

It is

Weak colors yes, but normal eink has no colors, and what do you mean by “so dark that you constantly need backlight…”?

How so? Color eink has pretty much zero tradeoffs as far as i can tell, other than price.

Note that the usual responsiveness problems dont apply when you use a pen to take notes, as the pen just directly pulls up the ink pellets in the screen.

Okay, eink is really really good at two things: reading and taking notes/drawing.

Comics are a form of reading (especially french comics i read, theyre 50% text).

You highlight parts of books.

And for taking notes, say in class, is much nicer when you have color avilable

Color is very useful for highlights, taking notes and reading comics, its fine if its not for you but its very interesting for me

Eink is just better for reading though

Want any help doing so?

Quick question, was that an existing copypasta or did you come up with it

Other people pointed out that nvidia and the goxlr have software, but you should know that theres a linux app for the stream deck.

i dont either, all im saying is that its still an improvement

Is google better? I get you dont like brave as a company (i dont either) but their search engine works well

Not totally true that its the only one, Brave search also has an indépendant index and (imo) works better.

Totally agree, nothing annoys me more than an ad that cant seem to even tell me what the product is.

Bot.

Also fb treats their advertisers like total crap

Excellent example choice lmao

Most new tv’s are smart tv’s by default, yo uave to pay extra for dumbness

Well, since you copy-pasted, i will likewise share my favorite take on thr situation.

After reading about the actual feature (more), this seems like an absolutely gigantic non-issue. Like most anti-Mozilla stories end up being.

The whole thing is an experimental feature intended to replace the current privacy nightmare that is cross-site tracking cookies.

As-implemented it’s a way for advertisers to figure out things like “How many people who went to our site and purchased this product saw this ad we placed on another site?”, but done in such a way that neither the website with the ad, nor the website with the product, nor Mozilla itself knows what any one specific user was doing.

The only thing I looked for but could not find an answer on one way or the other is if Mozilla is making any sort of profit from this system. I would guess no but actually have no idea.

There are definitely things that can be said about this feature, like “Fuck ad companies, it should be off by default” (my personal take), or “It’s a pointless feature that’s doomed to failure because it’ll never provide ad companies with information as valuable as tracking cookies, so it’ll never succeed in its goal to replace tracking cookies” (also my take). But the feature itself has virtually no privacy consequences whatsoever for anybody.

I’m absolutely convinced there’s a coordinated anti-Firefox astroturfing campaign going on lately.