• crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah no shit, and you do think I have a single goddamn bit of influence over my corporation’s choice of email client??

    • Elven_Mithril@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      well, as far as you use it just for your work, who cares, right? It’s the same as I’d never use Lastpass, my corp use it and even offered it for our personal use :D thanks, but no thanks! For personal use I would never use any microsoft solution.

    • remotelove@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They can leech all the data they want from my employer. I don’t give a fuck. Never use company assets for personal business as an addendum.

      Just be a little more careful with your own stuff, s’all.

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          A lot of healthcare and education institutions use Outlook as well, so I wouldn’t be surprised if mental health or legal uses it too. There may be rules about what kind of client/student/patient information can be sent over email, and often there are healthcare/institution specific variants of the office suites which (are supposed to) meet regulatory requirements

          I think the other comment applies regardless. Do work things on the work device/account and let the workplace handle any other concerns. When it comes time to discuss alternatives, you can make a case for something else

  • taanegl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Like if proton was a VPS kind of thingy, even like some form of managed mail service through a docker container or something, where the user had control? That would be nice. But even then, who’s to say they aren’t monitoring the mail communication from the other end of that? You can’t really trust any of these mail providers, because they simply have too much control over the days.

  • PlantObserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hey Proton how about you quit privacy-washing and actually prioritize and release feature parity products for Linux so your customers aren’t being herded onto windows’ data harvesting platform just so they can use your supposedly privacy forward products

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The Linux Experiment recently interviewed the CEO who answered this question.

      Basically it’s the same as anything else. Linux requires more effort to code for due to its variety of distributions, and has a significantly smaller userbase.

      In short, don’t blame Proton, blame the (lack of) users.

      • 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean, can’t you just package your app in flatpack or even snap? Bam, your app works on 99% of distributions for little effort. That’s what Spotify does, and I’d argue they have even less incentive to support Linux than proton does

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t know, I’m not a developer. Lots of companies don’t make their products available on Linux, most cite similar reasoning, so it’s unsurprising. But I agree it’s disappointing. I really wish Linux was more user-friendly.

        • cley_faye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Sure, as long as you don’t need any integration with other software, don’t need arbitrary IPC, and actually keep some dependencies in line with some common denominator because there’s only so much you can do with static linking (oh excuse me, distributing the shared libraries in the same package as your binaries as if it’s a new thing) once it reach the “program must actually run” part.

          Flatpack and every other similar solution that are described as “works everywhere” always come with a heck of limitations.

        • セリャスト@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          He also answered this claim, it is right for apps that aren’t stuff like Proton VPN that can’t work in a sandboxed environment. They are working on it iirc

  • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    On that topic, is there an alternative for a mail client + calendar for Win 11 that doesn’t look and feel like a Windows 95 exe named Thunderbird?

    • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Thunderbird did get a UI overhaul semi-recently so it might offer what you’re after now.

      I also liked eM Client which has a free version.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Outlook honestly was not that bad for a while, but of course Microsoft does what Microsoft does. I’ve been using Thunderbird for about a year now and it is very full featured coming directly from outlook.

      • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I use if for exchange and gmail - it’s pretty robust. Plus, they are approaching completion of their mobile app which has similar capabilities

        • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Looks like it uses IMAP. Nothing wrong with that. It is just common practive when locking down Exchange Online to tick the box in Conditional Access that disables “legacy protocols”, which includes IMAP. I’ve been using eM Client which uses EWS but doesn’t support push-mail so still on the look-out for something else.